ANTHROPOMORPHISM
John 2: 13-22 (NRSV)
It
has often been said that the difference between philosophy and theology is: If
you have an argument over philosophy, you get red in the face. If you have an
argument over theology you throw bombs.
Any
way you slice it, theology is serious stuff for most people who don’t usually even
joke much about it.
E.B.
White once commented: "People have re-cut their clothes to follow fashion.
People have remodeled their ideas too -- taken in their convictions a little at
the waist, shortened the sleeves of their resolve, and fitted themselves out in
a new intellectual ensemble copied from a smart design out of the very latest
page of history."
When
slavery to fashion and the latest trends invades the church, our religious
ideas are yesterday's fads. We adopt the world's agenda – but always just a few
years too late. Many churches wear last year’s theological bell-bottom pants or
the proverbial leisure suit.
John
W. Gardner once remarked: “In a practical sense an excellent plumber is
infinitely more admirable than an incompetent theologian. The society which
scorns excellence in plumbing because plumbing is a humble activity and
tolerates shoddiness in theology because it is an exalted activity will have
neither good plumbing nor good theology. Neither its pipes nor its sermons will
hold water.”
Martin
Luther said this to his son Martin: “If you become a lawyer, then I will hang
you on the gallows. Because some lawyers are greedy and rob their clients
blind, it is almost impossible for lawyers to be saved. It's difficult enough
for theologians.”
My
Theology professor Lee Barrett once told us: “If all the theologians in the
world were laid end to end, they still wouldn't reach a conclusion.”
Humanity
has so much trouble with theology because of the way we think and act. We
constantly reduce things to terms we can see and understand. None of us has the
same understanding or ability to search out truth in the exact same way.
Which brings me to our big word
for the day: Anthropomorphism, or how we
humans personify everything we
encounter, by describing it in human form or other
characteristics to anything other than a human being.
Examples include depicting God with a human form,
creating fictional non-human animal characters with human physical traits, and
ascribing human emotions
or motives to forces of nature, such as hurricanes
or earthquakes. That’s Anthropology 101.
If you have seen the famous picture of the dogs playing poker
that’s anthropomorphism at it’s best.
Anthropomorphism has ancient
roots as a literary device in storytelling,
and also in art.
Most cultures have traditional fables with animals who can stand or talk as if human, as
characters.
How many of you recognize ASLAN as the main character of C. S. Lewis's
The Chronicles of Narnia series?
He is "the great Lion"
of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
and his role represents Jesus. The author, C. S. Lewis, described Aslan as an
alternative version of Christ; that is, as the form in which Christ might have
appeared in a fantasy world.
Aslan helps us understand Jesus just a little better. But
Lewis mentions several times via his characters that we the reader must never
forget that Aslan is not a “tame” lion.
And just because Jesus appears human doesn’t mean He can
be understood in just human terms. He isn’t tame either and if you only see human
characteristics you’re.in trouble.
Theology, in essence, is just that: Humanity’s attempts
to explain God and how He acts and reacts to humanity. And we rarely remember
that God is not tame.
Listen to this passage from John, chapter 2, verses
13-22, about Jesus’ visit to the Temple, and His reaction to their
interpretation of human Temple theology:
The Passover
of the Jews was near, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. In the
temple he found people selling cattle, sheep, and doves, and the money changers
seated at their tables. Making a whip of cords, he drove all
of them out of the temple, both the sheep and the cattle. He also poured out
the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.
He told those
who were selling the doves, “Take these things out of here! Stop making my
Father’s house a marketplace!” His disciples remembered that it
was written, “Zeal for your house will consume me.” The Jews then said to him,
“What sign can you show us for doing this?” Jesus answered them, “Destroy this
temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”
The Jews then said, “This temple has been
under construction for forty-six years, and will you raise it up in three
days?”
But he was
speaking of the temple of his body. After he was raised from the dead, his
disciples remembered that he had said this; and they believed the scripture and
the word that Jesus had spoken.
Jesus
is clearly changing the Jewish theological center from a material, brick and
mortar human world, to a spiritual world based on Him as the touchstone of
truth and redemption. Jesus is the beginning and end of Heavenly theology.
As
the name implies Systematic Theology is the gathering of all that the
Scriptures teach as to what we are to believe and do, and what is known about
God. It is also in presenting all the elements of this teaching in a
symmetrical system with a beginning and an end.
All
my studies have led to the same place: God is consistent, persistent, and
delivers on every promise He has made. Our scriptures flow from Genesis to
Revelation; a beginning, a middle with human history and struggle, and the end
that show’s God’s delivered promises.
A
good systematic theology rests on the results of another big word, “Exegesis,”
bible study that is, for its foundation. Passages of Scripture studied, and
interpreted are its requirement. When
rightly interpreted by Divine inspiration they reveal their relations and place
in the system where Christ is the center.
Putting
God first is not only basic, it is crucial! Jesus said, “No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love
the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other...” (Matthew
6: 24). Earthly things will never replace heavenly things.
It’s
why people encounter the temple experience with Jesus cited in our
passage. We find out that God and Jesus
are not easily tamed and forced to do our bidding. It is a human temple, not
God’s house, that Jesus enters, and he corrects their errors.
Almost like an echo to
the abrupt correction that Jesus gave Peter in Matthew 16 (i.e. “Get behind Me,
Satan!”) are the words in Isaiah 55: 8, “’My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are
your ways My ways,’ says the Lord.” So the question is, how do we think
God’s thoughts after Him? The Holy Spirit.
We have this information
from Jesus regarding the coming of the Holy Spirit after Jesus returned to
heaven:
“However, when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into
all truth; for He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak; and He will tell
you things to come.” (John 16: 13).
The ability for believers
to discern the truth of God is made clear in 2 Corinthians 2: 9-16:
“But as it is written: ‘Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor have
entered into the heart of man the things which God has prepared for those who
love Him’
“But God has revealed them
to us through His Spirit. For the Spirit searches all things, yes, the deep
things of God. For what man knows the things of a man except the spirit of the
man which is in him? Even so no one knows the things of God except the Spirit
of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who
is from God, that we might know the things that have been freely given to us by
God.”
“These things we also
speak, not in words which man’s wisdom teaches but which the Holy Spirit
teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the
natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are
foolishness to him; nor can he know them,
because they are spiritually discerned.
But he who is spiritual judges all things, yet
he himself is rightly judged by
no one. For ‘who has known the mind of the Lord
that he may instruct Him?’ But we have the mind of Christ.”
So
what are we to believe without trying to add a human understanding? Can we make
simple enough to serve God?
A
Reformation Baptism vow of faith went like this:
I
take God the Father to be my chief end and highest good.
I
take God the Son to be my prince and Savior.
I
take God the Holy Spirit to be my sanctifier, teacher, guide, and comforter.
I
take the Word of God to be my rule in all my actions and the people of God to
be my people under all conditions.
I
do hereby dedicate and devote to the Lord all I am, all I have, and all I can
do.
And
this I do deliberately, freely, and forever.
(Baptismal
declaration written by Philip Henry, father of Matthew Henry)
This
would be a good starting place. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment